The Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) of the University plays a crucial role in maintaining and enhancing quality through academic and administrative audits. IQAC helps in establishing clear quality standards for both academic and administrative functions of the University. These standards are based on best practices, regulatory requirements, and the objectives and goals of the University. The two such best practices of IQAC of the University are: Regular Internal and External Academic and Administrative Audit, and a Feedback System developed in the University.
IQAC conducts regular academic and administrative audits to assess compliance with established quality standards. Academic audits focus on the quality of teaching, learning, and assessment processes, while administrative audits evaluate the effectiveness of administrative procedures and support services. Through audits, IQAC identifies the strengths and weaknesses in academic and administrative practices. This involves evaluating factors such as faculty competence, curriculum relevance, student support services, infrastructure adequacy, financial management, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Special emphasis is placed on ensuring Outcome based education to the students. The IQAC immediately after its conception ensured that all the syllabi clearly define Course Outcomes, Programme Outcomes and Programme Specific outcomes so that educational objectives are aligned with societal needs, industry requirements, and broader educational goals. This is done with an aim to produce graduates who are not only academically proficient but also well-prepared for the workforce. Academic and administrative audits conducted by IQAC prepare the University for external accreditation processes conducted by agencies such as NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council), NIRF and others.
Another best practice of IQAC of SGGSWU is its feedback mechanism. The cell gathers feedback from various stakeholders, including students, faculty, alumni, and employers. The feedback analysis committee analyses the collected feedback and submits its report with recommendations to the Dean Academic Affairs. The Dean approves the recommendation and communicates the necessary actions required to resolve the issues raised in the feedback forms, to the concerned Departments. The head of the Departments later submits the action taken report to the IQAC.
This feedback mechanism provides valuable insights into areas needing improvement and helps in making evidence-based decisions. The analysis of the collected feedback helps in identifying areas where the institution lags behind or excels and facilitates the adoption of best practices for quality enhancement.
Based on audit findings and stakeholder feedback, IQAC sets improvement goals and formulates action plans to address identified weaknesses and to capitalize on strengths. These goals are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART), ensuring effective implementation and monitoring. IQAC monitors the implementation of action plans and reviews progress regularly to ensure that quality improvement initiatives are on track. This involves tracking key performance indicators, analysing data, and making necessary adjustments to strategies as needed.
By conducting audits and sharing findings with relevant stakeholders, IQAC promotes accountability and transparency in the functioning of the University. This encourages all stakeholders to take ownership of quality improvement efforts and fosters a culture of continuous improvement. Compliance with quality standards identified through audits stands beneficial for the University in meeting its vision and mission.
S.No. |
Feedback Analysis Report |
Action Taken Report |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Feedback Analysis Report (2018-2019) | Report (2018-2019) |
| 2. | Feedback Analysis Report (2019-2020) | Report (2019-2020) |
| 3. | Feedback Analysis Report (2020-2021) | Report (2020-2021) |
| 4. | Feedback Analysis Report (2021-2022) | Report (2021-2022) |
| 5. | Feedback Analysis Report (2022-2023) | Report (2022-2023) |
Student’s Feedback Performa Regarding Design and Review of Syllabus
Alumni Feedback Performa Regarding Design and Review of Syllabus
Teacher’s Feedback Performa Regarding Design and Review of Syllabus
Employer Feedback Performa Regarding Design and Review of Syllabus
